Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mike G's avatar

I've been wondering about that teen employment puzzle too, besides the Haidt thesis. Hypotheses:

1. Employer preference to hire adult immigrants and pay under the table (lawn care, restaurants).

2. Collapse of teen "car culture" in boys. That was often the motivator to get cash.

3. Newspaper delivery as the on-ramp to teen work. Job disappeared.

4. The 2010 US Labor Department ruling on internship classification, making unpaid internships illegal in many cases, employers said "F this." The regs were dialed back in 2018 I think, but the damage was done.

5. Elderly clerks in grocery stores.

6. Retail jobs have 3 states: Nobody around (make eye contact if someone approaches); Sort of Looking (the right sort of help offer); Active Transactions. Some employees take out their phones during the first 2 phases; in past were more likely to "find stuff to do" (put out stock, etc). Customers less likely to want to interrupt a scrolling employee versus a "folding shirts" employee. So this is a different smartphone angle from a) Teens don't want jobs if they can pass time at home on phone, and b) Teens can't socialize because of phone.

What thinks you?

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?